Category Archives: technology and cricket

Withering before the Windies, Bangalore 20th March 2016

Michael Roberts … also see http://www.islandcricket.lk/columns/michael_roberts/473560223/downfall-against-the-windies-why-and-how

Sri Lanka slumped to a defeat against the West Indies at Bangalore on the 20th March because of a combination of factors, some self-made, some Windies-made and some due to horrendous umpiring error. Assigning weightage amongst an array of factors is never easy and is inevitably conjectural. I side-step that problem. Just let me run through these ‘forces’ one by one, progressing in temporal order.

AA=BADREE ++

The umpiring was calamitous and it was Sri Lanka who suffered – not once, but on three occasions. I begin with this undermining force because the first blow was in the 4th over of the Sri Lankan innings when Dilshan was batting effectively (12 runs in ten balls) and the score was 20 – not great, but not too bad. The ESPN writer reacted thus

Brathwaite to Dilshan, OUT, and strikes first ball! Boy, that looked a bit leg-side at first glance but he’s gone lbw. Full, angling into the pads, Dilshan aims through the leg side but misses. The umpire takes a long time but eventually the finger goes up. Oh dear, that’s missing by a long way.

The TV commentators were as definitive in their assessment of the South African umpire John Cloete’s terrible decision.

AA=CLOETECloete adjudicating in a previous match Continue reading →

1 Comment

Filed under Angelo Mathews, performance, Sri Lanka Cricket, T20 Cricket, technology and cricket, television commentary, unusual people, West Indian Cricket

No-Balling Murali: Emerson seeks the Limelight Again

Simon King caters to Emerson and media-sensationalism by letting Emerson and gossip reign, in a piece in The Weekend Australian entitled “Emerson reflects on Muralidaran and no-ball controversy”. The coloured emphases in this version are editorial highlights.

arjuna

Seventeen years ago to the day, standing at square leg during the 1999 one-day series between Sri Lanka and England at the Adelaide Oval, umpire Ross Emerson no-balled Muttiah Muralidaran for chucking. There had been an ominous air of expectation as Murali took the ball in the 18th over — Emerson had called him before during the 1995-96 tour. Channel’s Nine’s Tony Greig set the mood: “Right, well this is the moment everyone’s been a little bit nervous about, we’ve got Muralidaran about to be introduced into the attack. These two umpires when they were together both no-balled him for throwing, umpire Emerson, he started it last time.” Continue reading →

3 Comments

Filed under Australian cricket, confrontations on field, cricket and life, cricketing icons, cricketing rules, foul tactics, patriotic excess, politics and cricket, sanath jayasuriya, Sri Lanka Cricket, technology and cricket, tower of strength, unusual people

Kabooooooooom: Bats that smash records

Peter Lalor, in the Weekend Australian, 23 January 2016, where the title is “Wielding willow never so easy in the age of super bats”

bats Chris Lynn’s is a batsman’s version of a sawn-off shot gun — and just as lethal.

It’s so valuable he has found it in a teammate’s kit bag more than once. There are very, very few of these blades in circulation and they are highly sought after. A man would knife his own teammate for a weapon like that. Davey Warner’s cornered the market in the valuable pieces of willow, but he guards them like a father guards his teenage daughters. Ain’t nobody coming near his babies.

Usman Khawaja somehow managed to let him take one out on a date and broke the bloody thing. “Davey’s not going to be happy,” he said sheepishly. Davey wasn’t happy.

Davey wasn’t happy again this week when it seemed someone had pinched one and was selling it online. He considered calling in Border Force to make sure it wasn’t smuggled out of the country. The Iranians can have the bomb, but you don’t want weapons like that falling into foreign hands. The bats being used this summer are bigger than they have ever been in the history of the game. They are heavy, but remarkably light considering their girth. There is a batch of Gray Nicolls in particular that has teammates, opposition and seasoned watchers absolutely stunned by their size and power. “I have never seen so many balls fly into the top deck of the Gabba,” Lynn told The Weekend Australian.

He should know, he’s the one who has been hitting them there. Dubbed the “King of Six” in this year’s BBL, he has hit 27 balls over the boundary in the tournament. Check out the highlights reel. Marvel at him slogging Shaun Tait back over his head and into the top deck. Be warned that the video is officially classified batting porn and is NSFW (a baggy blue movie). These bats are so rare if Moses knew about them he would have added an XIth commandment: thou shall not covet thy teammate’s bat.

“I will go out for a fielding session and when I come back I find one in Joe Burns’ bag and one in Peter Forrest’s,” Lynn says.

Gray Nicolls bat whisperer Stuart Kranzbuhler handcrafts the willow for the company’s sponsored players. He estimates there are 30 at most in circulation and no guarantee that more will come.

“Everyone wants one,” he says.

Only the very best get them.

Warner has cornered the market in the bat they are calling a Kaboom Signature series. It is the biggest and most blessed beast in the whole of Christendom. The Australian opener has 15 of them and has been reluctant to share.

The Kaboom is 85mm thick at its widest part. You can buy a version of them in the shops and while they are the same dimensions, they are heavier and you will have to be superman to swing the thing.

The few that the first class cricketers have are extra special because they are much lighter.

They are, despite the rumours, not carved from the wood of the cross. Kranzbuhler explains that you can get a piece of willow that big, but it is usually from a young tree which has denser wood and is therefore heavier. Warner and his mates have been allowed to use some rare willow from older trees that allows the bats to weigh in at about 2lb 13oz.

A willow tree is at its best when it is 15 years old, but demand and disease mean few get to that stage and there is only a limited life for those that do as they degenerate soon after.

Warner uses his in Test matches, but most of the others use them only in the T20 because the weight slows down their swing, especially on cross bat shots.

Weight was one of the reasons why Lynn took his to the ground staff at the Gabba and got them to put it in the vice and saw the toe off.

“The theory behind that is — especially with Twenty 20 cricket — you don’t want to hit the ball in that nail length on the top of the bat near the handle, so you take a bit off the bottom and you move your hands up on the grip as much as you take off,” he explains.

“That’s my theory that I am working with at the moment. It might sound complicated but you are not moving your body or anything, it is all levelled out.

“At first it felt a little bit weird but I batted in the club game and batted all day and I got comfortable with it; having that extra bit of willow in the bottom of the bat is a whole new ball game. It’s changed my game, that’s for sure.

“What is so satisfying using the big bats is I have played a couple of pull shots, a couple of drives and cover drives without having to slog. I believe I can use these bats in Shield cricket as well.”

Kranzbuhler admits that Lynn has “got a really, really good one there”.

Lynn explains that he has always enjoyed going big and the key might have been a bat he used in the junior years.

“When you play in the backyard you want to hit the ball as hard as you can,” he said.

“You are always challenging yourself. Sometimes I am thinking I don’t just want to hit this ball for a six, I want to hit it out of the park, you want a story you can tell your mates about how far you hit it and you always want to hit one bigger than somebody else has.

“It has just worked into my game well, I have fast hands when I bat, my old man bought me a bat when I was about maybe 11 or 12 and it weighted 2lb 12oz. It was heavy and back then it was a big bat, nowadays it looks really small. That probably helped strengthen my wrists for batting, your wrists and forearms are the key when you are trying to hit the ball.”

The irony is that the biggest six of this tournament was a 117m heave by Dan Christian who uses a Kookaburra Bubble.

“I think it was further than that to be honest (laughs) … no way have I ever hit one that well before,” he told The Weekend Australian.

“Everything about it, trajectory, the way it came out of the middle of the bat, it just went miles. It was the perfect length and I slogged as hard as I could and timed it perfectly.”

Christian admits his willow is large, but nothing like the monsters Lynn, Warner and Khawaja use.

“I used to think it was big until these new ones that Davey and Lynney are using came out,” he said. “It is pretty worn in, the handle is almost gone so it is quite whippy … it was 2lb 10oz or 2lb 11oz when I first got it, but as they age they lose a bit of weight so it is probably about 2lb 9oz now.”

The batsman ought to enjoy this time while they can because the MCC Cricket Committee is almost certain to act soon and put restrictions on the girth of bats.

Leave a comment

Filed under Australian cricket, Big Bash League cricket, peter lalor, T20 Cricket, technology and cricket, tower of strength

Human Error in Third Umpire Room is the Problem, not DRS

Michael Roberts

It is human error in the Third Umpire’s Room that has caused some critical mistakes in umpiring in recent cricket matches. First by Nigel Llong in Adelaide and now by Richard Ketleborough in Hamilton. Ian Smith stormed out of the TV commentary rooms telling the world [around him] that the Third Umpire’s error could cause the Kiwis the match. Well might Russel Arnold have climbed the walls in Hamilton in the same style! The error was worse in fact: Kettleborough overturned an on-field “NOT OUT” where Llong confirmed an on-field error.

HOT SPOT Hot Spot

While several years of DRS experience has sharpened on-field decisions by the world’s battery of umpires, it appears that certain paths//facets of the technology are still not understood by some umpires (and maybe by all of the umpiring fraternity). I am not a technological wizard, but two comments by ordinary blokes in ESPNcricinfo reveal wizards of the kind we need …. as instructors to the whole class of top-umpires. I quote them below, but add my two bits worth first.

What was the common factor in the two major errors under discussion, that in Adelaide and that in Hamilton? The decision went in favour of the home side. SO… is that coincidence or cause? Continue reading →

Leave a comment

Filed under cricket and life, cricket governance, ICC, technology and cricket, television commentary

Another Third Umpire Error in Interpreting DRS has Fatal Impact on the Course of a Tight Match

Andrew Fidel Fernando, courtesy of ESPNcricinfo, 19 December 2015, where the title is “Jayasundera dismissal causes another DRS stir”

Sri Lanka bowling coach Champaka Ramanayake said the DRS system had “a lot of errors”, in the wake of what seemed to be an incorrect DRS call which cost Sri Lanka a wicket. Third umpire Richard Kettleborough had overturned Paul Reiffel‘s not-out decision on a caught-behind call on batsman Udara Jayasundera in the 23rd over of Sri Lanka’s second innings. There appeared to be no conclusive evidence that the batsman had gloved the ball on snicko or hotspot, but Kettleborough may have instead relied on a seeming deviation from the glove. This deviation, seen from a rear camera angle, was later shown to be an optical illusion.

Sri Lanka cricket team captain Angelo Mathews (R) speaks with the umpire RA Kettleborough during the final day of their third and final cricket Test match against Pakistan at the Sharjah International Cricket Stadium, in the Gulf emirate of Sharjah, on January 20, 2014. Pakistan pulled off a thrilling five-wicket win over Sri Lanka in the third and final Test in Sharjah, levelling the series at 1-1. AFP P PHOTO/ISHARA S. KODIKARA (Photo credit should read Ishara S.KODIKARA/AFP/Getty Images)

Sri Lanka cricket team captain Angelo Mathews (R) speaks with the umpire RA Kettleborough during the final day of their third and final cricket Test match against Pakistan at the Sharjah International Cricket Stadium, in the Gulf emirate of Sharjah, on January 20, 2014. Pakistan pulled off a thrilling five-wicket win over Sri Lanka in the third and final Test in Sharjah, levelling the series at 1-1. AFP P PHOTO/ISHARA S. KODIKARA (Photo credit should read Ishara S.KODIKARA/AFP/Getty Images)  — in Hamilton the Third Umpire mis-reading the DRS vis a vis Jayasundera’s dismissal was Kettleborough

Continue reading →

Leave a comment

Filed under Andrew Fidel Fernando, performance, Sri Lanka Cricket, technology and cricket, television commentary, unusual people

In Tony Cozier’s Footsteps ….. Cricket-Web features Fazeer Mohammed

Ganesh Venkat in Q and A with Fazeer Mohammed, Trinidadian Cricket Commentator …. http://www.cricketweb.net/interview-with-fazeer-mohammed-part-1/

Cricket Web’s Ganesh Venkat caught up with Fazeer Mohammed during the recently concluded Third Test between West Indies and South Africa at Bridgetown, Barbados. Fazeer is a well known Commentator and Broadcaster from Port-Of-Spain Trinidad and one of the few commentators who has not played the game at the highest level. In short you can call him the “Harsha Bhogle” of West Indies Cricket. Faz is taking over from Tony Cozier as the face of West Indies cricket behind the microphone. In the first part of the interview Faz talks about how he ended up commenting on cricket, problems facing West Indies Cricket, past players, current players and captaincy issues.

Fazeer

Continue reading →

Leave a comment

Filed under sportsmanship, technology and cricket, television commentary, West Indian Cricket

A Failure of Umpiring Common-Sense at Adelaide: Lyon’s Reprieve

Michael Roberts

Cricket umpiring is a difficult task and subject to human error. The cluster of technological systems and directives that make up the DRS today overcame the deep conservatism of the cricketing administrators (Indian obduracy and idiocy excepted) so as to improve the system and reduce errors. That objective has been secured; while the presence of the system has improved the capacity of umpires because they study its workings and can, now, make better judgements.

MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA - DECEMBER 28: Nathan Lyon of Australia swings at the ball during day three of the Fourth Ashes Test Match between Australia and England at Melbourne Cricket Ground on December 28, 2013 in Melbourne, Australia. (Photo by Michael Dodge/Getty Images)

Nathan Lyon of Australia swings at the ball on another occasion–Photo by Michael Dodge/Getty Images –just as he did at Adelaide where two sixes came off his bat

Continue reading →

1 Comment

Filed under close finsihes, cricketing rules, DRS, ICC, politics and cricket, technology and cricket, television commentary

Fallible Umpires? No Excuse for Fallible Third Umpire with TV Asset

Melinda Farrell and Daniel Brettig,  courtesy of ESPNcricinfo, 1 December 2015, http://www.espncricinfo.com/australia-v-new-zealand-2015-16/content/story/945583.html, where the title is “Did Lyon decision contravene ICC directive for DRS?”

Nathan Lyon‘s reprieve during the Adelaide Test appears to have been in direct contravention of the ICC’s directives for umpires using the DRS. In a decision New Zealand have lodged a formal protest against, the third umpire Nigel Llong ruled that Lyon was not out despite Hot Spot showing a mark where the ball had passed the back of the bat, before ballooning off Lyon’s shoulder and into the hands of Kane Williamson at slip.

Llong’s deliberations were broadcast live on the Nine Network’s television coverage and, while viewing the Hot Spot vision, he stated three times that he could see a mark. He then told the on-field umpire S Ravi: “There’s a mark on the bat but it could come from anywhere.”

ESPNcricinfo has confirmed that umpires make their deliberations under instructions that Real-time Snicko (RTS) is only to be used if Hot Spot does not show a mark. “If the umpire gives it out [and it is reviewed], the third umpire will look at the spin-vision replay to start with, then he’ll go to Hot Spot,” Geoff Allardice, the ICC head of cricket operations, had said when explaining the introduction of RTS in 2013. “If there’s a mark on Hot Spot he’ll go straight to out. That’s his conclusive evidence straight away. The only time Snicko will be used is if there’s no mark on Hot Spot.” Continue reading →

Leave a comment

Filed under Australia Cricket, close finsihes, cricketing rules, ICC, technology and cricket, television commentary

Pink Ball Day-Night TEST CRICKET breaks new ground

PINK BALLS

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Continue reading →

Leave a comment

Filed under Australian cricket, performance, taking the mickey, technology and cricket, unusual people

A Forgotten Cricket-Shattering Moment: The First Night Game in Cricket!

Gideon Haigh in The Australian, 26 November 2015,  where the title is “The Night when Cricket left the Dark Ages”

 Barry and Len -Getty Images Barry & Len at Adelaide Oval today–recognize them do you?–Pic from Getty Images

“It was in Barbados.”

“No it was Trinidad.”

“It was Antigua, wasn’t it?”

“Are you sure?”

“Well, your memory’s better than mine.”

Lunch was into its third hour, and the memories were coming thick and fast. The Aussies made this many. So-and-so made that many. Thommo was this quick. Dennis was this good. Among a bunch of journos at a restaurant table in Adelaide, Ian and Greg Chappell, Barry Richards and Len Pascoe were rolling back the years on the subject of Kerry Packer’s World Series Cricket, suddenly apropos again on the eve of the inaugural night Test match. Continue reading →

Leave a comment

Filed under Australian cricket, cricket tamashas, cricketing icons, Gideon Haigh, greg chappell, politics and cricket, technology and cricket, television commentary, tower of strength, World Series Cricket