Category Archives: television commentary
Aleem Dar—Three Howlers and OUT he should be
Aleem Dar—Three Howlers and OUT he should be
Michael Roberts
There is a striking moment in Ian Fleming’s Goldfinger when the criminal mastermind tells James Bond that once is coincidence, twice is happenchance and thrice is war ending in the dungeon. Well! On this comparison umpire Aleem Dar should be consigned to the umpiring dungeons or refuse bin. He has the distinction of committing the same type of horrendous umpiring error not once, not twice, but THRICE!
When a batsman nicks or plays a ball to one of the slips most human beings can perceive the splice of the process so to speak. But not Dar… Not once, not twice, but THRICE. I have a vivid mental image of all three moments. Continue reading
A RESOUNDING SILENCE: The DRS in the India-Australia Test Series
Michael Roberts
In watching this televised series on and off Iwas struck by the care with which the TV commentators avoided any refrence to that dreaded term DRS. There was at least one horrible decision when Iwas watching –Pujara in the Third Test; and another understandable but yet poor decision in the Fourth Test (Wade). But what did we receive from the venerable analysts behind the media presentation: RESOUNDING SILENCE on this issue. Obviously a decison from up above one can surmise.
But does it not indicate complicity in the obstinate idiocy on this point in India and the position of imperial domination they have establsihed in the cricket world? A RESOUNDING YES in my opinion. To be expected that answer — my question was rhetorical! Continue reading
Lone fighter Kumar Sangakkara gives fans 10,000 reasons to applaud
James Faulkner, in The Australian, 27 December 2012
IN A season of sterling catches it was fitting that yet another screamer was the only way to end Kumar Sangakkara’s Boxing Day masterclass. When, horror of horrors, Sangakkara mis-hit a Mitchell Johnson bumper, Matthew Wade ran at least 30m almost to the foot of the sightscreen to clutch a remarkable catch on an extraordinary day. Wade’s catch rivalled those taken this summer by Alviro Petersen, Nathan Lyon and Johnson himself, with the viewers no doubt delivering the final verdict later in the television season.
Before Wade’s moment of brilliance Sangakkara (58 from 98 balls with eight fours) stood tall and lonely as the wickets tumbled all around. His three hours of defiance soaked up more than a third of the balls faced by his side and his runs comprised more than a third of the total. The standing ovation when he posted his 10,000th Test run – the equal fastest in history to reach the milestone – was the most moving act of the day. This Melbourne crowd knows its cricket and loves a champion.
He reached the mark in 195 innings, the same as Brian Lara and Sachin Tendulkar and one better than Ricky Ponting. Sangakkara’s straight back was a rod for the Australian bowlers who threw all they had at the No 3 only for it to come back, with tax. Continue reading
Is it a crime to love the game? Three cheers for the you tube uploaders … Hip Hip Hurrah!
Jarrod Kimber, courtesy of ESPNcricinfo
In an Edinburgh hotel room I watched Mohammad Amir make 73 batting at No. 10 to almost defeat New Zealand in an ODI. I watched the match on an illegal stream; Giles Clarke’s archenemy. According to Clarke, cricket fans who watch illegal streams are defrauding their own sport by putting existing huge money TV deals into jeopardy. The very money that funds cricket and its administration.
If you choose to watch cricket on an illegal stream instead of subscribing, then in your own way that is what you are doing. Now maybe you have a valid reason, like having no money. Or you find subscription TV is little more than a stream of reality TV shows where Americans abuse each other while buying things from storage lockers. Having watched a fair bit of cricket on illegal internet streams, I’d doubt there are many people out there who can afford paying a subscription and still watch illegally. Watching illegally is really annoying.
When Sachin Tendulkar made his 100th hundred, it wasn’t shown on TV in the UK. So I went looking for an illegal stream as he got close. The first three websites wouldn’t work at all. The fourth would, but because of the sheer numbers of people watching, kept shutting down. An ad came up in front of the action several times. The sound and vision were never once synched. The screen pixelated for almost the entire time I watched … And more than once it just randomly paused so I was miles behind the live action. Watching illegal streams is never straight forward. Continue reading





Cricket as warfare
Don Hodges, courtesy of SPORT, 25 November 2013, where the title is “Ashes 2013-2014: Sooner or later, arms and ribs will be broken”
The news that Jonathan Trott is returning to England as a result of a “long-stand stress-related” condition puts England’s defeat in the First Test at Brisbane into perspective. Cricket is not, as Alastair Cook said at yesterday’s post-match press conference, “a war”. It’s a game. A highly professional, intensely contested, increasingly well remunerated game. But a game nonetheless.
Leave a comment
Filed under Australian cricket, baggy green, banjo patterson, bob katter, child of empire, confrontations on field, cricket and life, cricket governance, cricketing icons, fair play, farewell game, michael atherton, peter lalor, politics and cricket, sportsmanship, television commentary